Robots on the Rise: How India Can Become a Leader in Robotics Manufacturing

Nowadays, robotics are extremely popular in mining, packaging, manufacturing, and assembly sectors. Basically, robotics is the branch of technology that is related to the design, construction, operation, structural depositions, manufacture, and application of robots. Industrial robots are gaining a huge traction all over the world, mostly in the automotive industry due to their reliability, speed, intelligence, and accuracy.

Will India Become the Next “World’s Factory” in Electronics Manufacturing? An In-Depth Analysis

  • 10 years ago, India imported 98 percent of mobile phones and at present 99 percent of the devices are made in India.  In the coming days, 25 lakh people will work in electronics manufacturing.
  • During the COVID-19 situation in 2021, China manufactured around $1.7 trillion worth of electronics, which contributed 28 percent of global production.
  • China holds a 33 percent share of global exports with a value addition of $1,368 billion.

Times have gone by since electronic products manufactured by Chinese companies were treated contemptuously for their cheaper and inferior quality. But over the past fifteen to twenty years, China flipped the entire situation and earned the status of the “World’s Factory.” The country with 1.409 billion people turned out to be the world’s biggest electronics exporter, holding a 33 percent share of global exports with a value addition of $1,368 billion. The entire world was baffled by China’s quick dominance in the global electronics supply chain. Have you ever imagined, what’s the ‘Secret Weapon’ or the ‘Brahmashtra’ that helped China to spearhead the entire electronics ecosystem?

Many are still under the impression that it is China’s business monopoly scheme supported by the “Communist-Autocratic” rule, which follows no international regulatory or environmental compliance. Now, if you only abide by this thinking, then there is a misconception. In an effort to bolster the electronics manufacturing ecosystem, China offered a delectable strategic platter to the manufacturers, served with billions of dollars of subsidies in key infrastructures, cheap labor, and incentive schemes. 

Yogesh Suryavanshi, Executive Director and COO at NMTronics India

Highlighting the strategies of electronics manufacturing in China, Yogesh Suryavanshi, Executive Director and COO at NMTronics India, said, “All of us know how China was fifteen years ago. We used to crack jokes about Chinese products, but for the past few years, the situation has changed. They have educated themselves and kept on improving the quality of the products. The local customers and the government gave huge support to the manufacturing companies. For India, we are still learning to improve the products. Our comparison with Chinese suppliers is unjustified because they make production in high volumes and the cost of manufacturing is very low.

When we speak about China’s dominance in this ecosystem, India is now turning out to be the biggest competitor in this industry. Interestingly, India had the potential to lead international electronics manufacturing starting from the early 80s. Today, it could have the lion’s share in this industry, much more or similar to that of China. But there is a ‘bolt from the blue’ due to which she outsources 80 percent of raw materials and components from China. Before we delve deep into that aspect, we need to understand the strategies implemented and deployed by China’s government. 

Why is China able to board the global electronics growth bus while India is not?

Amid all the geopolitical scuffles, ‘Chip 4 Alliance’, and ‘China Plus One Strategy’, China still managed to establish itself as a global powerhouse for electronics manufacturing. The country already started investing in the electronics segment way back in the 1950s and commenced numerous research institutes and factories. In fact, students were given scholarships by the government to study electronics engineering abroad. Industry started growing at a staggering rate during the 80s and that’s when she was opened-up to the global economy. The global electronics company began investing in China to set-up its bases, and the nations started exporting its products.

Although various initiatives have been undertaken by the Chinese government in a span of 40-50 years, the nation has not been able to gain a reputation for producing quality electronic products in-house. This is when the government, policymakers, and manufacturers analyzed the situation conscientiously and started taking advantage of its own resources. They understood the mindset and demand ratio of their exporting nations and started making products as per the situation.

Electronic Products Store

Since the late 90s, the Chinese government has provided billions of dollars in tax exemptions and subsidies to the companies and has strongly developed power plants, roads, rails, and ports. Most importantly, the biggest advantage is having 37 rare earth elements such as germanium, gallium, lithium, etc., which are extremely useful in the manufacturing of electronic items like electronic displays, hard drives, flat-screen monitors, and many more. On the other hand, the nation is furnished with huge volumes of cheap labor, which magnetizes global companies to set-up their units, backed by decreased production costs. The free-trade agreements also proved to be a game-changer for foreign firms in exporting their products to other countries seamlessly. Even during the COVID-19 situation in 2021, China manufactured around $1.7 trillion worth of electronics, which contributed 28 percent of global production.

India, on the other hand, was backed by numerous electronics companies, who were willing to manufacture large-scale electronics, including components. The country suffered a massive setback when, in December 1997, India signed the horrendous Information Technology Agreement (ITA-1) in Singapore. This is the moment when the nation’s dream of leading the global electronics value chain was shattered into pieces. According to the agreement, the nation had to wipe out tariffs on a variety of electronic products, and the import duty was brought to zero on products such as computers, telecommunication equipment, semiconductors, semiconductor manufacturing and testing equipment, and many more.

Now, you all might be flabber-gasted by the fact that India surpassed China in this industry throughout the 80s and the 90s. Domestic IT firms such as Wipro and HCL exported a huge chunk of IT hardware products to several nations, including China. For instance, in 1995, the share of domestic value-added products was around 70.27 percent, which unfortunately decreased by 45 percent in 2011. Kudos to ITA-1. The then government instructed the industry to concentrate on software and let China manufacture electronic items. There was a lack of liaison between the industry and the government. 

N Ramachandran, Managing Director, Mel Systems and Services

In a recent SourceIndia event in Chennai, N Ramachandran, Managing Director, Mel Systems and Services, said, "Around 30 years ago, numerous electronic companies were not able to manufacture any kind of component because of the high restrictions imposed by the government in the industry. After every three months, manufacturers had to go to New Delhi to procure a new license for raw materials. The authorities during the late 90s even argued that India must focus on building software. We need real support for infrastructure and existing industries. The negative situation has changed dramatically because the government is now very proactive in supporting the industry.

“There are some unforgivable reasons due to which India missed the bus numerous times, such as bureaucratic lassitude, lack of leadership with a clear vision, lack of infrastructure, and corruption. Today, India is generations behind in this industry, mostly in semiconductor manufacturing.”

Choodie Shivram Independent Journalist

Independent Journalist-CHOODIE SHIVARAM

India’s Imperative Strategies to Counter China’s Growth in Electronics Manufacturing

After several months of heated discussions with industry bodies, the UPA government has finally unleashed the nation’s first National Policy on Electronics (NPE) 2021, and under its aegis, Electronics Manufacturing Cluster EMC 1.0 was formed. Although it’s termed as the most comprehensive policy formulation, the NPE 2012 failed to attract big-ticket investments, seed high value-added manufacturing in the India ESDM ecosystem, or create large-scale employment, according to an exclusive report by the Economic Times. During that time, the country suffered a huge setback when it witnessed the biggest scams of the generation: 2G, CWG, and coalgate. The focus again shifted away from the electronics industry, and by 2014, the NDA government had come to power. India's electronics industry endured the pain of its wounds with immense stoicism. Since 2014, the new government has prioritized the growth of the ESDM ecosystem in India. In the same year, PM Modi stressed the imperativeness of making products in India and launched the nation’s first “Make-in-India” initiative that elevated confidence among the manufacturers in India. In 2017, exports of electronic goods reached Rs 41220 crores, and production reached Rs 388306 crore as per a report by the government. By 2022, exports reached Rs 109797 crore and production had reached Rs 6,40,810 crore. 

Production Report

Source: Ministry of Information and Technology (MeitY) and DGCA

The nation witnessed a huge impact in this ecosystem, when the government revised the National Policy on Electronics in 2019 and, under its aegis, launched Production Linked Incentive (PLI) for fourteen sectors worth Rs 1.97 lakh crore. Under NPE 2019, Modified Special Incentives Scheme (M-SIPS), Electronics Manufacturing Clusters (EMC), and Scheme for Promotion of Manufacturing of Electronic Components and Semiconductors (SPECS) have been announced to boost the industry. In fact, the Aatmanirbhar Bharat campaign initiated during the pandemic in 2020 also played a key role in motivating manufacturers to make products in India and highlighted the imperativeness of self-reliance in electronics manufacturing. This is when Foxconn, Pegatron, and Wistron, now acquired by Tata, started producing Apple’s iPhones in the southern part of India.

Mobile Manufacturing

The nation is now one of the largest mobile phone manufacturing countries and world’s second largest smartphone market. The PLI scheme on mobile handsets and the Phased Manufacturing Programme (PMP) escalated mobile phone manufacturing to 290 million units in 2020-21 from 60 million units in 2014-15. Mobile phone exports from India will grow more than fivefold to USD 50-60 billion in the coming time from about USD 11 billion last year, Union IT and Communications Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said. He said that 10 years ago India imported 98 percent of mobile phones and at present 99 percent of the devices are made in India. Around 10 lakh people work in electronics manufacturing. In the coming days, 25 lakh people will work in electronics manufacturing. The government has now targeted $300-$400 billion worth of total electronics production and $125 billion in exports by 2026. Semiconductors are one of the crucial electronic components, which were largely ignored by the previous governments. Industry leaders have been calling for a separate incentive scheme for this industry for a long time. PM Modi, along with this cabinet, launched the much-awaited incentive scheme of Rs76,000 crore to boost the ecosystem. The scheme has targeted Micron to set-up its first ATMP unit in Gujarat. Now, TATA group and CG Power also announced a new fab and ATMP unit in Gujarat and in Assam. 

Highlighting more about the growth of the industry, Shri S Krishnan, IAS, Secretary MeitY, said, “Previously, the department was not looking to develop the core electronics, and the focus was mostly centered upon developing software, e-governance, and other aspects. But, in the past 5-6 years, the core electronics mojo has been back on track. We now have a very successful PLI on IT hardware, and 27 companies have signed MoUs and many of them have already started operating. This PLI offers benefits to the existing companies and provides subsidies as well. It recognizes that we are dealing with an industry where India has traditional strength, and we must use it in such a way that it benefits the country. Currently, 70 percent of PCBs used in India are still imported. Therefore, I urge industry bodies to work more closely with the government to give more suggestions on how to grow the industry more,” added Mr. Krishnan.

The Indian ESDM market contributed around 2.2 percent of the international market in 2021, which is expected to increase by 7 percent in 2026, claims an analysis of Frost and Sullivan. Now, when we again speak of China dominating the international electronics industry, the situation is now topsy-turvy owing to the augmenting geopolitical situation, supply chain disruptions, and the sudden spike in labor costs. Moreover, the global companies are now looking to shift their operations away from China and set-up bases in India, Philippines, and Vietnam. 

ESDM Market Share Chart

Source: Frost and Sullivan

The effect of COVID-19 has had a massive impact on China’s electronics production. In Q1 2023, there is a 15 percent decrease in semiconductor production and a 13.8 percent decline in smartphone production, which has affected domestic companies such as Vivo, Xiaomi, and Oppo. It has ultimately resulted in 4.5 percent GDP growth and 3.9 percent industrial output in March. According to the survey by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT), the EMS companies in China contributed 0.9 percent year-on-year escalation in value-added and saw a 5.8 percent escalation in value-added by the electronics information manufacturing industry. The production of mobile phones witnessed 935 million units, of which 679 million were contributed by smartphones.

Will India Become the “World’s Factory” in Electronics Manufacturing by Replacing China?

The government of India has undertaken strenuous efforts over the years to help the nation compete in the global electronics value chain. The nation is definitely growing in terms of exports and manufacturing backed by fruitful schemes, but there are a certain set of challenges that need solutions. Keeping aside mobile phones and other IT hardware products, India imports a huge chunk of components and raw materials from China. According to last year’s data, around 80 percent of PCBs and sensors were imported from China. As per Money Control report, shipments from China to India have augmented by $98.5 billion in Q1 2023. It is an increase of 4.16 percent in imports. Electronic equipment worth $30.63 billion were imported to India from China in 2022.

Then labor is another key challenge for India’s electronics manufacturing industry. According to Vinod Sharma, managing director of Deki electronics, labor is definitely available largely, but they do not have basic education on how to operate a machine. When they come to the factory, they are completely confused, and training needs to be given to them from scratch. Equipment price and design is also the key barrier. The equipment to produce electronics and semiconductor goods are highly expensive. India does not have a proper ecosystem to manufacture equipment and the designs are also mostly done for the foreign companies. Industry leaders are now calling for more real India made designs.

In an effort to reduce component imports from China, the finance ministry has recently unleashed 30 percent anti-dumping duty on bare PCBs up to six layers. Strategically, India is now in a better position to become the “World’s Factory” in the coming few years, but China’s unlimited subsidies, lack of regulatory compliance, and free trade agreement could be a challenging situation for India. Experts also opine that USA and Europe’s geopolitical scuffle with China could also prove to be a game-changing situation for India. India is now signing agreements with various nations to develop its semiconductor and electronics industry. 

https://circuitdigest.com/articles/how-anti-dumping-duty-on-imported-pcbs-has-sparked-fire-among-indian-smes-highlights-industry-experts-Put

It must be noted that the global economy has been in turbulence ever since the breakout of Covid in 2019.  While US and China tensions predated Covid, things have been getting increasingly difficult and unpredictable, with one crisis following the other.  The Ukraine- Russia War added immense stress to the global economy, especially in the areas of energy and materials, notwithstanding the immense human suffering and loss of property it has caused. Even as this war continues, there are growing tensions in the Middle East with Israel vs. Hamas standoff.

Speaking of India standing out as a bright spot amid the global tensions, Rajoo Goel, Secretary-General of ELCINA said, "In this entire milieu, India definitely stands out as a bright spot and beacon of hope.  With our focus on the ESDM sector, India has been pulling out all the stops to enable the electronics ecosystem and establish itself as a serious player in the global industry. While our economy and markets are growing, demand growth outpaced supply, and we remained dependent on growing imports. Concerted efforts in the last few years have salvaged the situation somewhat. However, much more needs to be done to create a sustainable ecosystem, especially with respect to value addition and manufacturing of components."

Have any question realated to this Article?

Ask Our Community Members

Open Source and the Electronics Industry

Submitted by Staff on

As embedded and miniaturized hardware solutions continue to advance, an increasing number of developers are opting for standardized open-source or license-free software solutions. Mouser Electronics and Adam Taylor, founder and lead consultant of Adiuvo Engineering & Training Ltd., discuss how open-source solutions impact the electronics sector and explore what the future could hold.

"Open source" can have different interpretations depending on your background. How do you define it within the electronics industry and from an electronics engineer’s point of view? What do you see as the pros and cons of open source?

It is an interesting topic to define, especially when separated from the software side. Open source is undeniably advantageous, as it enables shared knowledge and collaboration in a practical manner. It also enables the ability to explore existing designs and utilize them as a foundation or for inspiration.

However, one of the biggest issues with open source, especially in the world of electronics, is the surrounding confusion. There are varying degrees of permissions at the licensing level, which contributes to the complexity and misunderstandings; some licensed solutions provide complete freedom, whereas licenses like copyleft can be quite restrictive for certain applications. For smaller companies, this can be a major barrier as they may not have the resources to investigate where they stand legally in terms of usage.

Engineers often believe that every project is entirely unique. But in reality, even the most cutting-edge designs will incorporate ideas or components from other existing projects, and it is here where open source can foster collaboration and cooperation. Embracing open source provides engineers with the opportunity to leverage the knowledge of others, enhancing the potential benefits for their own projects.

How can an open-source solution impact product development?

Open-source initiatives allow engineers to build off existing ideas, whether these are development tools or electronic devices. With open source, engineers usually have a greater support network and larger working communities that can support when a problem or application arises. Essentially, open source significantly streamlines and enhances project development.

Open-source applications can also have a significant impact in terms of quality and compliance. In a closed-source environment, new designs have to undergo extensive internal checks. However, in an open-source environment, reputable designs have already passed through the scrutiny of several engineers. While this may not be sufficient for full validation in highly stringent applications, it can help to streamline the process.

From a business perspective, creating a strong product traditionally involves unique selling points and intellectual property. Are open-source solutions truly viable for market-ready products?

This is the major concern that can turn engineers away from open-source solutions. From a business standpoint, there is a concern about seeing no return on investment. Individuals are often unwilling to invest time and resources in open-source projects without seeing any benefits.

Looking at Adiuvo, for example, there is a real benefit in using open source to add value to a product or solution. With one of the new field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA) development boards, the schematic and layout will be open source to enhance the value of the product. The aim of incorporating open source as part of the business model is to appeal to engineers by making their jobs easier.

Open source needs to be a middle ground. As a business, you can make elements open-source and invite engineers in, but you have to be careful. There is not a one-size-fits-all solution for making open source a part of your business model.

What are examples you recognize as successful open-source electronics solutions, and where are these impacting the market? Are we looking at development solutions or final products?

Most developments in the FPGA market are focused on software and development tools, rather than providing a ready-to-use hardware solution or components that engineers can drop straight into their application.

This trend is similar to the impact that open-source solutions like compilers have had on the software industry. It is expected that this shift will also affect the development of hardware such as FPGAs, system-on-chips (SoCs), microcontroller units (MCUs), and more, where engineers add value from the application of the hardware, rather than the hardware itself.

How do broader industry-backed open-source solutions like Zephyr and Matter fit in, and what impact do they have on the electronics industry?

Evaluating embedded Linux as an example, this is an area where open source is thriving. For years, engineers have been doing very similar things in terms of the application and its requirements, using the same source or kernel but approaching it in a completely different way.

These varying approaches create a few issues, but one of the main ones is the portability of software engineers. Different approaches make it challenging for software personnel to switch projects or companies. This results in unnecessary training and redundant work by highly skilled individuals, as well as harming interoperability.

The Linux Foundation Yocto Project is a perfect example of widespread collaboration. It enables individuals to build embedded Linux solutions using a standardized approach, resulting in decreased deployment time and expenses while also fostering best practices. Other industry-supported solutions like Zephyr and Matter have been influenced by the success of Yocto. Its results showed that producing industry-focused contributions can positively impact businesses, end user’s projects, and the entire engineering community.

Has the rise of IoT and IIoT smart devices, with a focus on interoperability, impacted industry-supported open-source solutions?

Yes, but this is a component of a bigger theme, which is the search for standardization. While engineers like to start from scratch, this is not always the best way to go about development for the end user—especially in terms of smart homes or connected services.

Evaluating Matter as an example, the reason it is successful is more tied to its ability to get companies to agree on a standard, rather than it necessarily being open source. A closed-source free standard could easily have the same impact, so it is the standardization with low cost of entry that is the critical factor, rather than if it is open or closed source.

What are your thoughts on hybrid approaches that involve a fusion of open-source and closed-source solutions, and how do these approaches benefit both suppliers and developers?

At the heart of being an engineer is the ability to identify or create the perfect solution for a particular use, delivering it on time, to a high quality, and within budget. This hybrid approach truly embodies this principle and is increasing in popularity across the industry. As long as licensing rules are adhered to, it is a sensible way to conduct business.

When delving into many open-source hardware solutions, they typically involve a hybrid approach. Looking back at the Linux example, many Yocto-based solutions are running on closed-source hardware. Similarly, many larger open-source hardware solutions will usually have a closed-source proprietary connector or component in there.

Finally, how do you predict the future market share of the electronics industry in terms of proprietary versus open source?

There will likely be a rise in open-source solutions as there are a number of driving factors, including the proliferation of development tools, the closer relationship between software and electronics, and the complexities of modern applications lending themselves to the sharing of information.

Twenty years ago, developing an FPGA solution required a significant financial commitment and a steep learning curve, limiting entry to big companies. Free editors, simulators, and synthesis tools are now available for download, effectively eliminating the entry barrier. Many larger hardware manufacturers are now happy to provide free resources to better support their products, causing a significant shift.

In the coming years, it is highly probable that the electronics industry will be greatly influenced by open-source solutions encompassing software, hardware, and AI.

Original Source: Mouser

Adam Taylor About Author: Adam Taylor is a professor of embedded systems, engineering leader, and world-recognized expert in FPGA/System on Chip and Electronic Design.

Have any question realated to this Article?

Ask Our Community Members

How the New Anti-dumping Duty (ADD) will Impact PCB Manufacturing in India?

  • India imposes 30% anti-dumping duty on bare PCBs from China and Hong Kong, safeguarding domestic electronics manufacturing
  • Manufacturers and associations support the move, emphasizing the need to strengthen PCB manufacturing for self-reliance
  • Stakeholders stress investments in infrastructure and technology to capitalize on India's electronics industry growth

India's electronics industry is rapidly growing, targeting $300 billion in total production and $125 billion in exports by 2026. However, achieving self-reliance requires bolstering the major component ecosystem. Currently, India relies heavily on imports, particularly from China and Vietnam, for crucial components. The PCB market in India reached $4.5 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach $11.8 billion by 2028, highlighting its significance. PCBs serve as vital components connecting electronic parts in various consumer electronics and IT hardware products. To support industry growth, government intervention is necessary through initiatives like a separate Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme and subsidies for equipment, power, and R&D. As India approaches its production target, an estimated $150 billion worth of components, including PCBs, will be required.

Feeling the heat of the importance of boosting PCB manufacturing, the Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, after several rounds of discussions, has finally imposed a 30 percent anti-dumping duty (ADD) for a period of five years on bare PCBs which are imported from China and Hong Kong. Both the manufacturers and the industry associations welcomed this move by the government. They feel that although the manufacturing of PCBs is complex, it is not as difficult like making semiconductors. India is very well-poised to manufacture it on a large-scale, both for its own consumption and for the rest of the world.

Sanjay Aggarwal, Managing Director, Globe Capacitors

Although the ADD tariff would prove to be optimistic for the Indian PCB industry, there are loads of challenges that require countermeasures. According to last year’s data, around 85-90 percent of PCBs were imported from China. In an exclusive interaction with Circuit Digest, Sanjay Aggarwal, managing director of Globe Capacitors, said that a huge chunk of PCB requirements are imported, which is not sustainable and makes us susceptible to fluctuating global crises. PCB manufacturing requires high-quality infrastructure and is characterized by a very high output ratio of 1:1 or 1:5. It has a complex supply chain, and the equipment required for its manufacturing are very expensive.

Protecting Domestic Industry: The Need for Imposing Duties on Imported PCBs

In an effort to safeguard India’s domestic electronics industry, the Indian Printed Circuit Association notified the government in December 2022 that there is an ongoing ‘Threat to Material Injury” due to massive dumping of components such as bare PCBs from China and Hong Kong. Therefore, there is a significant requirement of anti-dumping duty on the imported PCBs. After analyzing and investigating the situation thoroughly, the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR), the right arm of the Commerce ministry, recommended anti-dumping duty on imported PCBs in January 2024. The authorities have added that the duty will affect the availability of electronic items to the consumers. During the course of the investigation, the DGTR revealed that PCB imports from China PR and Hong Kong were sold below fair market rates, causing tangible harm to the domestic sector. Under the authority vested by sections 9A(1) and 9A(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, the Central Government authorized anti-dumping duties on specified PCB imports. These duties, calculated as a percentage of the CIF value of imported PCB goods, aim to counter the adverse impact of PCB dumping and protect domestic industry interests. 

Applauding the government’s anti-dumping duty on imported PCBs, Murali Srinivasa, founder, CEO at LionCircuits, told Circuit Digest, “The Indian and China’s PCB manufacturing markets are not on the same level. What the Indian government has now done will boost and elevate confidence among the country’s manufacturers. The Chinese government gives a lot of subsidies in terms of water and electricity, which is an important requirement for the manufacturing of PCBs. This is why, in the last 10-15 years, China has evolved its manufacturing ecosystem. Because of price cuts from China, Indian PCB makers have suffered a lot. But, this anti-dumping duty is not going to be a long-term solution. This is just for five years, and within this time frame, the PCB manufacturers will have to become globally competitive. At Lion’s Circuit, we are also trying to become globally competitive independent of the subsidies.”

Murali Srinivasa, Founder, Lion Circuit

“What China is doing is not a realistic market scenario. In this situation, all the Indian OEMs, product manufacturers, and R&D houses were left with no option, but to procure raw materials from China. This is because there are no Indian manufacturers who can offer electronic goods at competitive prices. At Lion’s Circuits, we have launched a ‘Make-in-India’ plan, where we are offering two-layered boards for 10 dollars. India should have the ability to manufacture a two-layer PCB board in just 24 hours. We have to increase production and make sure that processes and factories are running smoothly, backed by cutting-edge equipment. In 2, 4, and 6 layered boards, which is the largest market both in terms of transactions and volume are imposed with the import duty,” added Murali. 

This decision underscores the government's commitment to fair trade practices and ensuring a level playing field for all stakeholders in the PCB market. According to the official spokesperson of DGTR, "while the domestic industry has been able to increase the selling price at present due to concentration on profitable segments, the continued imports at dumped prices have not allowed it to increase the sales beyond those segments and pose a threat of price suppression and depression on the domestic industry." Initially, the duty recommended was in the range of 8.23 percent to 75.72 percent of the cost, insurance, and freight (CIF) value. When any country is under the impression that its domestic industries are being largely impacted due to an escalation in below-cost imports, then anti-dumping investigations are carried out and certain duties are imposed following the instructions of the World Trade Organization (WTO). 

The PCBs with more than six layers and the populated ones were not included in the investigation. According to the government report, $478 million worth of PCBs were imported from Hong Kong and China during April-October 2023. According to the IPCA, there are around 200 SME category PCB makers in India whose businesses are largely impacted due to the huge volume of dumping for more than four years. Therefore, the Indian PCB industry needs to ramp up and compete with global industry to support local manufacturing and EMS companies. This is vital, if India wants to benefit from this measure taken by the government, or else, it may have a negative impact due to the rise in manufacturing costs.

The PCB industry in India faces tough competition from neighboring countries such as China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, which have a vast history of PCB manufacturing, benefits from top-notch technology, decreased production costs, and economies of scale. The infrastructure and the supply chain is quite insufficient, which is posing a huge impediment to its manufacturing. Most importantly, the power supply is highly infrequent and is not subsidized. Then, there is a shortage of sophisticated machinery and equipment, which are very costly for Indian SMEs to procure. For a very long time, manufacturers and industry bodies have been urging the government to come up with an additional scheme and incentives for the equipment and machinery segment.

Sanjay Agarwal added that as per an exclusive 'ELCINA PCB Ecosystem Development Report 2023', India  requires adding innovative large-scale PCB plants addressing 5 million Sq. Meters of ML and 2 Million Sq. meters of Flex/Rigid-Flex units in the coming five years. Currently, the nation requires seven large PCB factories equipped with 1 Mn. Sq. M plant capacity. Moreover, it requires an investment of Rs 7,000 crores that will provide a yearly revenue of Rs 10,500 crore along with a direct employment of 7000 , and 35,000 employment indirectly in the value chain.

Anti-dumping Duty to boost Indian SMEs and PCB Industry claims Industry Experts

This is a strategic move, which is welcomed both by the PCB manufacturers and the industry bodies. According to them, ADD is not a long-term solution, this is also a strong pillar for the PCB industry in India. Anti dumping measures are promulgated to ensure free trade and create a level playing field for a particular industry segment. It is not a measure to restrict imports or to accrue an increase in the cost of a particular product. To this end, the policy is well thought out and does not look at things from a myopic perspective. Let’s find out below what the industry bodies told Circuit Digest exclusively:

Rajoo Goel, Secretary, Electronics Industries Association of India

Rajoo Goel, Secretary-General, Electronics Industries Association of India (ELCINA)

Anti-dumping duty on Bare PCBs is a definitive action for preventing dumping of this key electronic component in the Indian market. Dumping from China has been suspected for a long time. The government abstained from this tough action as the electronics industry was divided because the users of PCBs expressed concerns about the escalation in manufacturing cost. However, the ADD has been limited to PCBs upto 6 layers, and several high end PCBs have been exempt. This effectively means that less than 70 percent of the market by value is being protected, and this will decline further to below 50 percent in 3-4 years as technology and products upgrade. However,  the growth and opportunity are immense.

Anurag Awasthi, Vice President, IESA

Anurag Awasthi, Vice President, India Electronics and Semiconductors Association (IESA)

India is now aiming for Atmanirbhar Bharat in electronics manufacturing, in which, PCBs are the fulcrum. Currently a huge segment of the PCB requirement in the country is imported, while there are over 200-300 PCB manufacturers in India who are supposedly supplying only 60 percent of their output to the Indian market, while exporting 40 percent. The current anti-dumping duty levies are specific to those companies and sources that apparently supply well below the raw material cost in India. These are structural anomalies, which need to be removed for any domestic or global investor to invest in large scale PCB manufacturing in India. We have to learn from the Koreans, who only source from Korean brands - similarly, Indian EMS companies need to learn and have a mindset change to source from India as well. While there is no visible scarcity in terms of capacity, the need to factor in slightly more costs to fight against dumping from other nations should be considered.

Thiyagarajan, President, IPCA

M Thiyagarajan, President, Indian Printed Circuit Association (IPCA)

The PCB is the backbone of any electronic product. We have raised this dumping duty issue with the government in an effort to protect India’s domestic electronics industry. This is a basic component, and if we are not self reliant and constantly import, then there will be a semiconductor like situation. This is a very doable technology, unlike semiconductors which require high-end equipment, billions of investment, and specialized skilled forces. India is very well-versed in terms of PCBs, and we have started making PCBs much before China even thought of it. Initially, there will be a few shortages of PCBs from this decision, but we will find a solution like we did during COVID. For instance, there was a time when India used to import huge amounts of food grains from other countries, and today we have excess as the government has paid attention to it. We are not against FDI, we are suggesting they make products in India and then sell it in the country.

Pankaj Mohindroo, Chairman, ICEA

Pankaj Mohindroo, Chairman, India Cellular & Electronics Association (ICEA)

The imposition of Anti-dumping Duty (ADD) would be a considered decision. All along, there was strong evidence of dumping in the entry level PCB segment. We have urged the government to strongly abide by this decision or else Chinese dominance will never come to an end. India is now growing very rapidly, and if this pace is continued, we will definitely set a benchmark in the global electronics industry. 

Have any question realated to this Article?

Ask Our Community Members

In a Candid Video Interaction, Varun Manwani Explains How India Will Lead Global Electronics Manufacturing

  • Sahasra is proud to say that it is shipping motherboards to Korea and memory solutions to the US, Europe, and in the Middle East
  •  With the help of PLI schemes, India is now having the potential to overcome the disabilities in the manufacturing sector and make products in a large-scale manner for Indian consumption and for export to the world.

There Must Be Increased Focus and Investment in R&D to Foster Indigenous Semiconductor Design Capabilities

With the significant incentives and increased budget allocation for the semiconductor industry, India is on the track for remarkable growth in the coming five years. These initiatives will fuel investment in semiconductor manufacturing facilities, research and development, and talent development programs. As a result, India is likely to emerge as a prominent player in the global semiconductor market, competing on both domestic and international fronts. India can 100% compete globally.

New Tech Tuesdays: Innovations in E-Bike Technology

Submitted by Staff on

Join Rudy Ramos for a weekly look at all things interesting, new, and noteworthy for design engineers.

What are e-bikes, and what is their main purpose? E-bikes—electric bicycles equipped with electric motors to assist riders with propulsion—represent a fusion of technology with the traditional biking experience. Their assisted pedaling power makes cycling easier, more accessible, and downright fun. Pedal assistance can be particularly beneficial in covering longer distances, tackling hilly terrain, and arriving at destinations without excessive physical exertion or sweating, making e-bikes a practical option for commuting and urban travel.

E-bikes also offer an environmentally friendly alternative to cars for short to medium-distance travel, helping to reduce traffic congestion and lower carbon emissions. In fact, e-cargo bikes (i.e., e-bikes equipped with baskets for transporting goods) are perceived as an advantageous solution for urban last-mile logistics. Using e-cargo bikes is ideal for low volumes of goods and short distances in urban areas where access to conventional cars may be prohibited.[1]

Lastly, even with motor assistance, e-bikes still provide a form of exercise, as pedaling is typically required to engage the motor, especially on pedal-assist models.

This week, we take a quick look at different types of e-bikes, their regulations, and some of the embedded tech powering them. 

Types of E-Bikes and Regulations

While there are various types of e-bikes, they generally fall into two main categories:

  • Pedal-assist e-bikes amplify the rider's pedaling effort. They typically have a motor that activates only when the rider is pedaling, boosting to their natural pedal power. The amount of assistance can usually be adjusted, allowing the rider to choose how much help they receive from the motor.
  • Throttle-based e-bikes have a throttle that can engage the motor without the need for pedaling, similar to how a motorcycle or scooter operates. This allows the rider to move forward using just the motor’s power.

With e-bikes making their way into parks alongside traditional bicycles, the U.S. National Park Service (NPS) has established regulations governing the use of electric bicycles within the National Park System. The NPS defines an e-bike as “a two- or three-wheeled cycle with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts that provides propulsion assistance.” An updated memorandum includes additional requirements that an e-bike may not exceed 100 pounds or reach 20mph when powered solely by the motor, prompting many states to create their own regulations for e-bikes using a three-class system limiting the maximum assisted speed of e-bikes.[2]

  • Class I: e-bike equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle reaches 20mph
  • Class II: e-bike equipped with a motor that may be used exclusively to propel the bicycle and that is not capable of providing assistance when the bicycle reaches 20mph
  • Class III: e-bike equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle reaches 28mph

The Tech Driving E-Bikes

The average range of an e-bike—the distance it can travel on a single charge—varies widely depending on many factors. However, most e-bikes can typically cover 40 to 80 kilometers (25 to 50 miles) on a single charge. This range can be influenced by factors such as battery capacity, motor efficiency, riding conditions, rider input, bike load, e-bike settings, and the overall condition of the e-bike, including the age of the battery.   

E-bikes with larger batteries can store more energy, providing a longer range. Similarly, the efficiency of the electric motor plays a critical role in how effectively it uses battery power. Hills, headwinds, and rough terrain, in addition to the bike’s carrying load, all play a role in how much the motor needs to work. Also, the more a rider pedals and the less they rely on the motor, the longer the battery will last. Many e-bikes have different modes, such as eco, normal, and high power, impacting how much the motor assists. Over time, the battery’s condition can cause them to lose capacity, leading to decreased range.

In recent years, there have been several notable developments in e-bike technology, including lighter-weight designs with foldable features (Figure 1), higher capacity batteries with smart connectivity, upgraded safety features, and automatic gearing systems.

E-Bike with Foldable Design

Modern e-bikes often feature smart systems that integrate digital technologies with physical components, enhancing user experience with advancements such as over-air updates, connectivity with apps like Bosch's e-Bike Flow App, and tracking personal cycling goals directly through the bike's system.

E-bike safety technology has also seen enhancements, including new anti-lock braking systems that are smaller and lighter, thus reducing accidents significantly. Additionally, there are innovations like digital anti-theft features, alarm systems, and tracking capabilities for enhanced security.

Additionally, the adoption of automatic gearing systems like that of the Enviolo® Harmony™, which has a number of advantages over traditional gearing systems,[3] has greatly simplified the riding experience and reduced the overall maintenance needs of e-bikes while also contributing to user-friendly e-bike designs.

All these technological developments reflect riders’ evolving demands and preferences, offering more efficient, versatile, and accessible options for a broader range of consumers. The e-bike industry continues to innovate, focusing on sustainability, user-friendliness, and technological integration.

The Newest Products for Your Newest Designs

This week’s New Tech Tuesday showcases gate drivers from Texas Instruments and Infineon Technologies. Both gate drivers are ideal for half-bridge brushless direct current (BLDC) motor drives and have built-in bootstrap diodes for the high-side capacitor.

The Texas Instruments DRV8300 and DRV8300-Q1 are components designed for three-phase BLDC motor control, commonly used in applications like e-bikes. These devices are essentially gate drivers that facilitate the motor’s control and operation by driving the gate terminals of the MOSFETs in the motor's electronic speed controller.

The DRV8300-Q1, specifically, is an automotive-grade version that offers robustness and higher reliability. It supports up to 100V operation, making it suitable for higher voltage applications. This series is known for its advanced protection features, ensuring enhanced system robustness, which is crucial in e-bike applications where safety and reliability are paramount. Additionally, these devices are designed to minimize noise issues and improve efficiency in motor operation.

Their use in e-bike applications is especially beneficial due to their efficiency in controlling the motor, contributing to the overall performance and reliability of the e-bike. This makes e-bikes equipped with such technology more efficient, safer, and potentially more powerful, enhancing the riding experience.

Next, the Infineon Technologies MOTIX™ 160V Gate Drivers are an advanced solution for motor control, particularly suitable for e-bike applications. These drivers are designed for half-bridge BLDC motor drives, a common configuration in e-bikes and other mobility applications. One of their key features is the ability to support a 100 percent duty cycle operation through a trickle charge pump, ensuring consistent and reliable motor performance. The gate drivers also boast protection features such as undervoltage lockout (UVLO) and overcurrent protection, which are crucial for the safety and durability of e-bike systems.

Furthermore, the MOTIX series emphasizes optimized efficiency and reduced electromagnetic interference (EMI), which are essential for maintaining the performance of e-bikes in diverse operating environments. The built-in bootstrap functionality of these drivers facilitates their use in high-power applications, making them ideal for more demanding e-bike designs that require robust power-handling capabilities.

Overall, the Infineon MOTIX 160V Gate Drivers provide e-bike and other e-mobility applications with enhanced control, efficiency, and safety features, contributing to their improved performance and reliability.

Tuesday’s Takeaway

E-bikes represent a fusion of traditional biking with advanced technology, providing an assisted pedaling experience that makes cycling more accessible, enjoyable, and practical. They serve as an efficient, environmentally friendly alternative for urban travel and commuting, offering numerous benefits for a diverse range of users. E-bikes have evolved with advancements in technology, leading to enhanced performance, safety, and versatility. These technologies allow e-bikes to achieve better speed control, more extended range, and overall improved riding experience.

Original Source: Mouser

About the Author

Rudy RamosRudy Ramos Rudy is a member of the Technical Content Marketing team at Mouser Electronics, bringing 35+ years of expertise in advanced electromechanical systems, robotics, pneumatics, vacuum systems, high voltage, semiconductor manufacturing, military hardware, and project management. As a technology subject matter expert, Rudy supports global marketing efforts through his extensive product knowledge and by creating and editing technical content for Mouser's website. Rudy has authored technical articles appearing in engineering websites and holds a BS in Technical Management and an MBA with a concentration in Project Management. Prior to Mouser, Rudy worked for National Semiconductor and Texas Instruments.

Have any question realated to this Article?

Ask Our Community Members

How is India Forming Strategies to Strengthen its ACC Battery Ecosystem Backed by PLI Scheme

  • India needs to run on local ACC manufacturing, creating a robust ecosystem for innovation and economic growth.

 What are Advanced Chemistry Cells and Why Are Efforts Being Made to Boost the Ecosystem?

ACCs are cutting-edge advanced storage technologies that have the ability to store electrical energy either as chemical energy or electrochemical energy and convert it back to electric energy when needed. Basically, ACC batteries are mostly used for EVs and energy storage, but they are also massively consumed in numerous other sectors such as UPS, mobile phones, telecom, inverters, etc. According to the experts, growing a domestic advanced cell supply chain ecosystem will help the country become globally competitive in terms of mobility, consumer electronics ecosystem, and grid energy storage. The domestic supply chain will help get rid of the challenges of any sort of supply constraints, which can put the overall battery industry at risk. Currently, India is at the nascent stage of developing its in-house advanced cell manufacturing ecosystem, and speaking of the global supply chain, its presence is very limited.  According to the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), the market demand in the nation for ACC batteries is speculated to grow from a staggering 220 GWh by 2030 to 20 GWh in 2022 at a CAGR of 50 percent.

Why the PLI Scheme for ACCs will be a Game-Changer for India’s EV Industry

Feeling the heat of the importance of ACCs, the union government, after several rounds of discussions, has announced the much-awaited Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme, the 'National Programme on Advanced Chemistry Cell (ACC) Battery Storage’ with a budgetary outlay of Rs 18,000 crore in 2021. With the help of this scheme, India is looking forward to a manufacturing capacity of 50 GigaWatt hours (GWh) of ACC. The aim is to escalate the domestic value addition in EV battery manufacturing and, at the same time, decrease the cost of batteries so that the nation can become globally competitive in the EV ecosystem.

Under the PLI scheme for ACC, around ten companies have submitted their bids. Ola Cell Technologies Pvt. Ltd., ACC Energy Storage Pvt. Ltd., and Reliance New Energy Battery Storage Ltd. have benefited from the scheme, and one of the bidders who had been approved previously has been disqualified by the government for non-compliance with the terms and conditions. Just a month ago, the union government even announced the re-bidding under the PLI for ACC so that the approved bidders could set up a huge battery manufacturing unit of 10 GWh with an outlay of Rs 3,620 crore.

Speaking on how the PLI scheme for ACC will be a game-changer for India’s EV industry, Soumen Mandal, senior automotive researcher at Counterpoint Research, told Circuit Digest exclusively, “India's automotive market is slowly transitioning to EVs. More than 1.5 Mn EVs were sold during 2023, a massive growth of 50 percent YoY. Approximately 40 percent of the initial cost of an electric vehicle (EV) is attributed to batteries, which India mostly imports. This import dependence leads to increased EV costs. The PLI scheme prioritizes the local manufacturing of Advanced Chemistry Cells (ACCs) in India, aiming to establish a more efficient supply chain and reduce battery cell costs, thereby making EVs more economical. In 2023, around six percent of sales were contributed by EVs in the automobile segment, and by 2030, 40 percent of sales will be contributed by electric cars. This will be possible if the PLI for ACC and FAME 11 is successfully implemented.

India Automotive Sales Share

Although India is working hard to boost the ACC battery storage capacity, industry leaders feel that the supply chain and finding the right talent are the major hurdles for firms to set up lithium-ion cell manufacturing units.

With a focus on maximizing domestic value addition, the PLI scheme encourages investments in Giga-scale ACC and battery manufacturing facilities, which will not only drive technological advancements but also create employment opportunities. Furthermore, by incentivizing continuous sales of domestically manufactured batteries, the scheme instills confidence in manufacturers to invest in long-term sustainability and innovation. Overall, the PLI scheme for ACC has the potential to revolutionize the EV battery ecosystem in India by fostering a competitive and self-reliant industry while accelerating the adoption of electric vehicles nationwide.

The Current Challenges in India’s ACC Battery Ecosystem

Although various initiatives have been undertaken to grow the ecosystem and become self-reliant, experts feel that the limited availability of key raw materials like lithium and cobalt poses a significant challenge to battery manufacturing. This shortage often leads to dependency on imports, which can be expensive and subject to geopolitical risks. Then, the cost of imports is another major challenge in this ecosystem. Importing raw materials from foreign countries, particularly China, can be costly due to tariffs, transportation costs, and currency fluctuations. This adds to the overall manufacturing expenses, impacting the competitiveness of domestically produced batteries. There are huge regulatory hurdles. The stringent rules and regulations, both domestic and international, can create barriers to manufacturing and exporting batteries. Compliance with environmental standards, safety regulations, and trade policies adds complexity and cost to the process.

Sonam Motwani, CEO and Founder at Karkhana.io, told Circuit Digest, “While some lithium reserves have been identified in India, the exploration and processing of these resources are still in progress. Developing domestic capabilities for mining and refining lithium could help reduce dependence on imports. Manufacturing advanced chemistry cells requires sophisticated techniques and infrastructure. Ensuring that manufacturing facilities are equipped with the latest technology and skilled personnel is essential but can be costly and challenging to implement.

Despite India's increasing demand, India’s dependence on imports highlights the huge gap in domestic production. Investment in batteries continues, and the lack of ACC facilities hampers self-sufficiency. India needs to run on local ACC manufacturing, creating a robust ecosystem for innovation and economic growth. The PLI initiative is an important step in this direction, catalyzing India’s journey towards energy independence and global competitiveness in the EV revolution.

Imports are always the major concern for India, both in terms of electronics manufacturing and electric vehicles. The country lacks the ecosystem and the policies to develop the raw materials. For instance, Lithium has been discovered on a large scale in Jammu, but a lack of advanced equipment, policies, political constraints, and environmental issues makes us more dependent on China.

Highlighting the major cause of imports and other barriers in this ecosystem, Rohit Pandit, Managing Director, Shuzlan Energy, said, "The challenges to the ACC ecosystem are multifaceted. First, it relies heavily on imports to meet demand, highlighting the lack of strong domestic manufacturing capacity. Second, existing investments in batteries do not meet global standards, hindering scalability and competitiveness. Furthermore, low prices lead to increased dependence on foreign suppliers. To address these issues, India needs strategic investments in ACC manufacturing, coupled with incentives for R&D and innovation. Collaboration between industry and academia can foster technological development, while structural change can encourage the integration of local production and supply chains. Ultimately, fostering a healthy ecosystem is key to achieving self-sufficiency and global competitiveness in the ACC region."

To reduce dependence on thermal energy and decrease air pollution on a large scale, the government of India even approved the National Mission on Transformative Mobility and Battery Storage in March 2019 to enhance clean mobility. The price of Li-ion batteries has been reducing at a rapid scale and is therefore accelerating the market for battery storage internationally. According to the government’s think tank public policy agency, Niti Aayog, the price of Li-ion batteries has been reducing at a CAGR of 20 percent.

ACC Manufacturing

The positive scenario is that the country both has the talent and the resources to set up cells and battery packs. Although numerous firms have already begun investing in the assembly of battery packs, the capacities of these units are not large when compared to international averages. The entire value addition and investment in ACC manufacturing are still very low in the nation, and therefore, over 80 percent of the demand for ACCs is still met through imports, mostly from China. 

How India Can Tackle the Challenges in the Coming Years

In an effort to meet this huge demand in the EV industry, various countries have already started manufacturing the battery storage ecosystem on a rapid scale. Manufacturing capacities over 5 GWh/year have already started developing all over the world. According to a survey by NITI Aayog, China has responded to this demand faster, with 78 percent of international manufacturing capacity for batteries, while Europe and the US hold a share of 7 percent and 8 percent, respectively. Researchers even feel that the anticipated capacity additions between 2022 and 2025 will surpass 1,450 GWh of new annual production capacity internationally, with China holding the majority of the market share and Europe as the emerging epicenter of higher growth.

Now, if India wants to improve its overall battery manufacturing ecosystem, then a phased approach is needed that can merge a large volume of the value chain over time as domestic demand escalates and in-house scientific proficiency and capacity improve to meet the demand. Therefore, a coordinated and strategic approach is the urgent need of the hour. Continued government support through initiatives like the ACC PLI scheme is crucial. Policies that incentivize domestic production, research and development, and exploration of raw materials can help overcome challenges related to shortages and import dependency.

At the same time, investing in R&D to develop alternative battery chemicals or improve existing technologies can mitigate the impact of raw material shortages and reduce manufacturing costs. Most importantly, the challenges in this ecosystem can be addressed impeccably through collaboration with other countries, and international organizations can facilitate knowledge sharing, technology transfer, and access to raw materials. Establishing partnerships for the joint exploration and processing of resources can help diversify the supply chain.

What’s more essential is building infrastructure for mining, refining, and manufacturing batteries domestically. On the other hand, addressing environmental concerns associated with battery manufacturing is important. Implementing sustainable practices, such as recycling and minimizing resource consumption, can mitigate the environmental impact and ensure the long-term viability of the industry. By countering these challenges and implementing strategic solutions, the ACC ecosystem for batteries can be strengthened, enabling sustainable growth and competitiveness in the global market.

"Currently, India's ACC ecosystem is nascent, and we must wait a few years for the market to mature and address these challenges effectively. Advanced Chemistry Cells (ACC) represent innovative power storage technologies that have the potential to store electric energy as either electrochemical or chemical energy. They can subsequently convert this energy back into electricity as needed. Given the anticipated surge in battery demand over the next decade, almost all major global battery manufacturers are actively investing in ACC technology from a commercial standpoint," added Soumen.

Have any question realated to this Article?

Ask Our Community Members

India will soon have its own Fabs to compete against China

In an effort to boost the semiconductor industry of India, the incentive scheme of Rs 76,000 Crore was unleashed back in December 2021. Apart from this, the finance minister allocated Rs 3,000 crore in the budget session of FY 2023-24 and this year the amount has been increased to Rs 6,903 Crore. This move is an escalation of more than 200 percent in regards to semiconductor and display manufacturing. Speaking of the growth, the government and the industry bodies are looking for $55 billion by the end of 2026 and $110 billion by 2030.

Why Without Developing Automation and Digitization, India Cannot Succeed In Electronics Manufacturing Globally

 In the current product mix, out of the 100 billion dollars, we are actually manufacturing 52.7 percent of the electronics components, according to last year's data.

The union government, policymakers, and the manufacturers have been undertaking key initiatives to boost the country’s electronics and semiconductor manufacturing ecosystem. In an effort to position India as a global hub for ESDM and semiconductor manufacturing, the Production Linked Incentive Scheme (PLI) for large-scale electronics manufacturing, IT Hardware, Scheme for Promotion of Manufacturing of Electronic Components and Semiconductors (SPECS) and Modified Electronics Manufacturing Clusters Scheme (EMC 2.0) have been unleashed. In fact, the government has unleashed the most promising incentive scheme of Rs 76,000 Crore to attract investments from major semiconductor players. With the help of these schemes, India's electronics export is expected to reach $120 Bn by FY26. During April-November 2023, electronic goods exports were recorded at $17.74 Bn as compared to $14.36 Bn during April-November 2022, registering a growth of 23.56 percent.

According to some industry leaders, who wished to be unnamed, stated that around 30 years back, numerous electronic companies were not able to manufacture any kind of components because of the high restrictions imposed by the government in the industry. After every three months, manufacturers had to go to New Delhi to procure a new license for raw materials. The authorities during the late 90s even argued that India must focus on building software and let China lead the manufacturing ecosystem. In this regard, N Ramachandran, Managing Director, Mel Systems and Services Ltd, feels that the negative situation has changed dramatically because the government is now very proactive in supporting the industry.

Ramachandran said, “We need real support for infrastructure and existing industries. No small-scale unit can start an operation by purchasing land especially in cities like Chennai and this is because the price of land is more than their ability of investment. They cannot move to other smaller locations because their customer base, infrastructure, and manpower is located within the city. The level of subsidies is still inadequate in terms of components manufacturing. This is because they have higher investments, and the margin is very low. There is a requirement of additional PLI in areas such as PCBs and other components where the margins are very low.”

EMS Growth

Speaking of the current challenges and prospects of India’s ESDM industry, Shri S Krishnan, IAS, Secretary MeitY feels that previously, the department was not looking to develop the core electronics and the focus was mostly centered upon developing software, e-governance and other aspects.  Currently, 70 percent of PCBs used in India are still imported. But, in the past 5-6 years, the core electronics mojo is back again on the right track. India is now having a very successful PLI on IT hardware and 27 companies have signed MoUs. Many of them have already started operating. This PLI offers benefits even to the existing companies and provides subsidies as well. The overall projected investment is only about Rs 2,500 Crores.

In an effort to counter the grave impediments, industry insiders mentioned that as India now competes in the global electronics market, sustainability has to be the core business strategy. All the major manufacturers including both the giant companies and MSMEs must look into sustainability deeply, and start transforming the major source of their unit’s energy into green energy. Most importantly, these sectors need to create more employment, which can fulfill the dreams of the youth and make them more passionate to do something for their own country. For instance, Tata group has also invested Rs 2000 crores in the ITIs, which can be used for upskilling and reskilling. The industry has to come forward and form partnerships with all the stakeholders. 

Amid all the challenges associated with the industry, how India can fulfill the mission of achieving the target of $300 billion by 2025-26. Managing Director of Deki Electronics, Vinod Sharma said that it is not that easy to achieve that target even in the coming four years. Sharma said, "I am not pessimistic about the target, but if 2.4 trillion dollars of electronics is divided by 8 billion population, then there will be $300 per capita consumption of electronics. We will definitely reach that target in a short period, but in the three years it seems difficult. Companies, which are not preparing for that target will definitely be left behind. In the current product mix, out of the 100 billion dollars, we are actually manufacturing 52.7 percent of the electronics components, according to last year's data." 

“When we reach or close to reaching the target of 300 billion dollars, 150 billion dollars of components will be required, which is a little more than the amount of oil we are importing today. In fact, a week back, the nation imported more sensors than PCBs. Therefore, we need to chalk out a clear strategy to increase the volume of exports and reduce the key imports, and find out ways to escalate the value addition,” added Sharma.

Semiconductor Industry Growth

Speaking of the future prospects of growth in the market, Richard Puthota, Senior Director Business Development at MacDermid Alpha Electronics Solutions mentioned that when customers are manufacturing different products, it helps to understand what kind of markets are emerging in the country. With the global engagements with major OEMs, the picture is crystal-clear where the industry is moving forward. When decisions are being made for the coming five years, developing technology is not the sole priority, but the numbers and the growth rate must be taken into consideration.  

Richard said, “EVs in automotive segments will help us in achieving huge growth numbers. In fact, the customs duty imposed on white goods appliances will also give us a huge number. From the technology side, IoT and cloud computing will play a significant role in boosting the growth of this industry and most importantly, the telecom sector will add huge value addition in the electronics industry. India’s export of electronics is going to reach 120 billion by the end of 2026. The biggest advantage of India is that it is leading in both production and consumption. Speaking of the FAME scheme, both state and the central governments come up with sales penetration of 80% on two and three wheelers, 30% on private cars, 70% commercial cars, 40% buses by 2030.”

Around ten years back, there was no possibility for India to contribute to the ESDM and semiconductor value chain. The imperative aspect is that India is already doing a lot of design on semiconductors, but they are done for international companies, which will cater to the benefit of that particular country.  It is now high time for the country to start doing design for itself. Now, the manufacturing area is a huge one and is about building a fab or an OSAT. There are a lot of procedures involved and India is nowhere in that ecosystem. 

Speaking on the contribution in the value chain Mr. GS Madhusudan, Co-founder and CEO, Incore Semiconductors Pvt Ltd. said, “It’s not about the technical talents and we have dozens. For instance, when the US asks us to develop or do a design, we do it. 30-40% of designs happen outside India. Extensive product knowledge is lacking among us. We have an advantage as we are having huge consumers of the products. India should actually focus on parts costs between 50 cents to 5 dollars because most of the consumption will be in this range. We have to build older node products such as compound semiconductors, power IGBTs, RF with older technology and if we do that, I think India can supply between 10-15 percent of the world’s demand.”

Industry experts even feel that developing automation is the urgent need of the hour for the progress of India’s manufacturing industry’s growth. India must look at it as a lens of maximizing efficiencies, minimizing rejections and at the same time, bringing consistency and improving the quality. Consistency can only come from automation and scale. For India to become a global hub for manufacturing electronics, automation becomes extremely important. But the point is how, when, and at what cost. 

Speaking of the challenges and growth of automation in industry, Ms. Nandini, Director at Tescom Pvt Ltd. said, “Msmes face the biggest challenge in deploying automation. We do not have a proper training center and costs are huge. Therefore, we start training workers when they join the organization. But, after 1-2 years, the workers start looking for jobs in a bigger organization. People in inspection systems and in testing are in huge demand and these are the areas which need to be automated.  So, in our SMT line, almost everything is automated, but post SMT activities also need to get automated within the timeframe of two years. If it’s delayed, we will definitely miss the bus.”

Sasikumar Gendham - Managing Director at Salcomp Manufacturing India Private Limited and Vice-President at ELCINA opines that ‘Rome was not built in a day.’ Therefore, India will also become a global powerhouse of manufacturing in the coming few years. But, without developing automation and digitization, there is no way India can succeed in electronics manufacturing globally.

Have any question realated to this Article?

Ask Our Community Members